Help

"1st Look" at the New "But For" Standard in Massachusetts Torts

Doull v. Foster: simplifying an unnecessarily confusing rule

  • Product Number: 2210359WBC
  • CLE Credits, earn up to:
    2 substantive credits, 0 ethics credits CLE Credit Note
  • Add to Favorites List

Choose Date/Location:

Registration for this program is closed
Also Available:
MP3 Download
MP3 Download Add to Cart
Includes downloadable supporting materials. $145.00; Members $130.50; New Lawyers $72.50 Free for OnlinePass subscribers.
Ondemand Webcast
On Demand Webcast Add to Cart
Includes downloadable supporting materials. $145.00; Members $130.50; New Lawyers $72.50 Free for OnlinePass subscribers.
On Demand video and audio
Related On Demand Videos
See Agenda below to purchase individual video segments from this program. Pricing varies by video length. Member and new lawyer pricing available. Free for OnlinePass subscribers.
  • Product Description
  • Agenda & Materials
  • Faculty
  • Product Description

    Product Description


    This program is a must for all attorneys litigating medical malpractice, personal injury, toxic tort, and other similar cases in Massachusetts. The Supreme Judicial Court in Doull v. Foster recently abandoned the substantial factor test for the "but-for" causation standard in most cases. Judges, juries, and attorneys in Massachusetts have been trying to understand and apply the confounding substantial factor test in personal injury cases and other torts for decades. In an effort to bring clarity to the causation standard, the SJC affirmed that juries should be instructed on "but-for" causation in most cases, even those where multiple acts of negligence have been alleged. The only exception exists in asbestos and other toxic tort matters. For those cases, substantial factor causation was retained, but its survival could be short lived. The Doull decision presents both pitfalls and opportunities for attorneys handling these cases.  

    Every attorney involved in tort litigation should attend this presentation to learn how this important decision will impact their pending and future cases.

  • Agenda

    Agenda & Materials

    Please Note

    MCLE webcasts are delivered completely online, underscoring their convenience and appeal. There are no published print materials. All written materials are available electronically only. They are posted 24 hours prior to the program and can be accessed, downloaded, or printed from your computer.

  • Faculty

    Chair

    Vincent N. DePalo, Esq., Smith Duggan Buell & Rufo LLP, Boston

    Faculty

    Robert L. Boston, Esq., Smith Duggan Buell & Rufo, LLP, Boston
    Barrie S. Duchesneau, Esq., Trial Lawyers for Justice, Decorah
    Stesha A. Emmanuel, Esq., McCarter & English LLP, Boston
TOP