All
Help

Impact of SCOTUS Decision in Counterman v. Colorado on Defining a True Threat

Protecting both free speech and victims of threats

recorded
  • Product Number: 2240228WAU
  • Publication Date: 5/30/2024
  • Length: 1 hour CLE Credit Note
  • Copyright: © 2024 MCLE, Inc.
  • Add to Favorites List

Your Selection:

Pricing: $125.00; Members: $112.50; New Lawyers: $62.50
Free for OnlinePass subscribers.
Add to Cart Member and new lawyer discounts applied in cart.
Also Available:
On Demand video and audio
Related On Demand Videos
See Agenda below to purchase individual video segments from this program. Pricing varies by video length. Member and new lawyer pricing available. Free for OnlinePass subscribers.
  • Product Description
  • Agenda & Materials
  • Faculty
  • Product Description

    Product Description

    In June 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Counterman v. Colorado, overturning a stalking conviction based on hundreds of Facebook messages sent by the defendant to a local female musician. The Colorado stalking statute mandated an objective test for whether communications were threatening, penalizing those that would cause “a reasonable person to suffer serious emotional distress.” The Supreme Court concluded that constitutional protections for free speech required something more, namely that the government prove the defendant’s subjective intent to threaten. Specifically, the Court held that the government must prove at least a mental state of “recklessness” in order to obtain a criminal conviction based on speech. The ruling represented a shift in the law about “true threats,” a long-standing exception to First Amendment protections.

    Join our instructors as they dive into the details of the decision and explore its implications for both First Amendment jurisprudence and practical issues in criminal and civil law.

  • Agenda
  • Faculty
TOP