Product Description

In Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled decades of circuit precedent that required Title VII plaintiffs to prove not only that they’d been discriminated against at work, but also that the discrimination caused them a significant disadvantage by harming their career prospects or their pocketbook.

Hear from one of Muldrow’s lawyers about how Muldrow’s case came to the Court. The speakers also address the impacts of the Court’s holding that an employee challenging a discriminatory job transfer need not show that the discrimination caused them some additional, significant harm.

Agenda & Materials

• 1:00 - 1:15 pm

  Muldrow’s Path to the Supreme Court

  on demand video Add to Cart

  Madeline Meth, Esq., , Jamaica Plain
  
• 1:15 - 1:20 pm

  Understanding Muldrow’s Holding

  on demand video Add to Cart

  Madeline Meth, Esq., , Jamaica Plain
  
• 1:20 - 1:45 pm

  Muldrow’s Impact Beyond Title VII and Discriminatory Transfer Cases Including DEI Initiatives

  on demand video Add to Cart

  Robert M. Hale, Esq., Goodwin Procter LLP , Boston
  Madeline Meth, Esq., , Jamaica Plain
  
• 1:45 - 2:00 pm

  "Ask the Experts" Q&A Session and Key Takeaways

  on demand video Add to Cart

  Robert M. Hale, Esq., Goodwin Procter LLP , Boston
  Madeline Meth, Esq., , Jamaica Plain
  

Please Note

MCLE webcasts are delivered completely online, underscoring their convenience and appeal. There are no published print materials. All written materials are available electronically only. They are posted 24 hours prior to the program and can be accessed, downloaded, or printed from your computer.

Chair

Faculty