Product Description

Massachusetts has expanded the definition of abuse in the context of G.L. c. 209A by including “coercive control” as a basis for obtaining an abuse prevention order. Massachusetts is the seventh state to have done so.

We explore the recent changes to the definition of coercive control under Chapter 209A. This session provides a detailed review of the revised statute’s language, tracing its legislative history to illuminate the journey to this pivotal update. Our faculty analyze how these changes may influence the interpretation of abuse in related statutes and gain insights into the guidelines for judicial practice concerning abuse prevention proceedings, particularly regarding coercive and controlling behaviors.

In addition to a comprehensive overview, the program compares Massachusetts’ new definition to similar statutes enacted in other states, allowing for a broader understanding of this legal landscape. Attendees also examine judicial responses to hypothetical scenarios involving coercive control, fostering practical application of the new framework. Finally, we address unresolved issues that may emerge in appellate court cases

Don’t miss this opportunity to stay informed and enhance your legal practice in the context of domestic abuse prevention. 

Agenda & Materials

• 3:00pm - 3:05pm

  Welcome and Introduction

  on demand video Add to Cart

  Brigid E. Mitchell, Esq., Brigid Mitchell, P.C. , Fall River
  
• 3:05pm - 3:15pm

  Coercive Control & 209A: Legislative History of the New Language

  on demand video Add to Cart

  Jamie A. Sabino, Esq., MLRI , Boston
  
• 3:15pm - 3:30pm

  Change to the Forms, Word from the Judiciary, Definitions in 209A v. 208 Section 31A

  on demand video Add to Cart

  Denise M. Fitzgerald, Esq., Probate and Family Court Administrative Office, Commonwealth of Massachusetts , Boston
  
• 3:30pm - 3:50pm

  "Coercive Control & 209A: The Practical Application of the New Language - States and Relevant Caselaw from Other States Who Already Implemented Coercive Control"

  on demand video Add to Cart

  Grace C. Roessler, Esq., Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee LLP , Boston
  
• 3:50pm - 4:05pm

  Coercive Control & 209A: Practical Application from the Judiciary's Perspective

  on demand video Add to Cart

  Hon. Kimberly Moses, Probate and Family Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts , Canton
  
• 4:05pm - 4:30pm

  "Ask the Experts" Q&A Session and Key Takeaways

  Panel
  

Please Note

MCLE webcasts are delivered completely online, underscoring their convenience and appeal. There are no published print materials. All written materials are available electronically only. They are posted 24 hours prior to the program and can be accessed, downloaded, or printed from your computer.

Chair

Faculty