Help

Criminal Forensics

Reliability, admissibility, confrontation

  • Product Number: 2210151P01
  • CLE Credits, earn up to:
    4 substantive credits, 0 ethics credits CLE Credit Note
  • Add to Favorites List

Your Selection:

All of the faculty presentations from Criminal Forensics may be purchased individually. Expand the Agenda below to see all options.
Also Available:
MP3 Download
MP3 Download Add to Cart
Includes downloadable supporting materials. $195.00; Members $175.50; New Lawyers $97.50 Free for OnlinePass subscribers.
Ondemand Webcast
On Demand Webcast Add to Cart
Includes downloadable supporting materials. $195.00; Members $175.50; New Lawyers $97.50 Free for OnlinePass subscribers.
On Demand video and audio
Related On Demand Videos
See Agenda below to purchase individual video segments from this program. Pricing varies by video length. Member and new lawyer pricing available. Free for OnlinePass subscribers.
  • Product Description
  • Agenda & Materials
  • Faculty
  • Product Description

    Product Description


    Lawyers are not scientists, yet prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges must assess, understand, and present science in many criminal cases. From the seemingly simple to the clearly complex, lawyers rely on "experts" to bridge the gap between law and science. But the lawyer's job, which includes assessing the reliability and admissibility of scientific evidence, cannot be wholly delegated to an "expert." How can you equip yourself to evaluate scientific evidence in your cases?

    Learn about the role of cognitive bias in every area of criminal forensics. You may already know about the concept of cognitive bias in forensic science generally, but this session highlights the extensive research that has been conducted in areas as varied as pathology, fingerprints, and mixture DNA. You also hear from prosecutors about approaches to forensic evidence, including measures that advance the use of valid forensics to solve crimes more quickly, ensure that invalid "science" is not relied upon to secure convictions, and promote the provision of complete forensic discovery. Develop tools to challenge, confront, and prepare experts, no matter the subject. Get practical skills to better engage with the scientific issues that arise in your cases.

    Have your questions ready—the panel wants to hear from you!

     
  • Agenda

    Agenda & Materials

  • Faculty

    Chair

    Radha Natarajan, Esq., New England Innocence Project, Boston

    Faculty

    Patricia J. Cummings, Esq., Supervisor, Conviction Integrity Unit, Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, Philadelphia
    Jeffrey Kukucka, Towson University, Towson
    Carrie Wood, Esq., Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, Philadelphia
TOP